Middle School Book Reviews
Major Project Review
Project Goals:
-
To improve Reading Literacy by inviting students to participate in a project
that promotes individual choice and interest in reading, and will serve
as a vehicle for a middle school summer reading program;
-
To provide a portal for students to access book reviews written by other
middle school students;
-
To provide a vehicle for students to submit book reviews electronically;
-
To provide links for students to search for books of interest by genre
or author;
-
To provide instruction for students on web page design using Netscape Composer;
-
To provide instruction for students on the use of a scanner for submitting
illustrations and/or scanning student-designed book jackets;
-
To provide instructions for students on the use of a digital camera;
-
To provide instruction for students on grammar, editing and writing skills;
-
To provide opportunities for students to work with peers, in this case,
a Learn and Serve opportunity for our National Junior Honor Society students,
in peer-tutoring for editing and writing/grammar skills;
-
To provide an opportunity for students to develop interest in web design
skills and a personal advocate to help in developing these skills during
Homeroom or Advisory time, twice per week, throughout a trimester.
-
To provide an opportunity for students to evaluate information on the Internet
based on criteria, as they begin to recommend appropriate links based on
reading literacy for their peers.
-
To establish a framework for a successful student-owned, multi-faceted,
online summer reading project.
Project Description:
To pilot the project, a student survey form
was generated and disseminated through Language Arts classes. These classes
ranged in levels from English/Reading, Communications and Honors Communications,
in both seventh and eighth grade classes. Surveys were distributed to a
total of 5 classes, with results from 110 students.
After survey results were analyzed, it was apparent that students from
all levels of classes had an interest in being part of the development
of this multi-faceted project. 12% of seventh grade students and 35% of
eighth grade students participated in a summer reading project last year.
Of the students involved for both levels, 10% enjoyed the summer reading
project options. The average number of books read was 2 for both grade
levels. Comfort level of use of the Internet was 2, on a continuum of 1-5,
with 1 being very comfortable. Student visitation of the school web site
is limited, with 60% of students visiting once a month or less. No students
have ever submitted a book review electronically, although 84% of students
reported interest in sharing review with other middle school students via
an online form. 48% of students had interest in helping to develop a site
for book review linked to the school home page. In response to genres of
books read for enjoyment, the choices, ranked by interest of student were:
science fiction, fiction, historical fiction, mystery, sports, fantasy,
non-fiction, poetry and biography. In response to what students would like
to see in a book review, the open-ended responses were: a rating scale
from 1-5, summary of the book, a drawing or illustration of a favorite
scene, character or book jacket, a description of the main character, who
the book would appeal to, number of pages in the book and a recommendation
for the book. These comments and analyses were incorporated into the review
form that students would use to submit their reviews to the web site.
Two students were chosen, by classroom teachers, from each level, for
a total of 6 students, to represent the pilot stage of the project. These
students read books of their choice and submitted a review of their book.
These students worked in the Computer Lab to design a form for students
to submit their review electronically.
Much discussion ensued regarding the questions and fields to be submitted.
Some of the students felt there should be a longer form with many questions
to submit. Other students felt two or three questions would be enough to
generate a response. The students settled on the form presented in the
major project review. Questions from the number of pages in a book to listing
if we had the book in our school library, led to an additional link to
be added to the site to our school's Accelerated Reading book list as an
option for students. This link also provides a grade level for each book.
Students felt that might be positive when searching for books of interest.
In addition, they could earn "Accelerated Reader" points after completing
the book, and taking a short comprehension test. They were excited about
this "plus".
Students met with me and worked during their Homeroom or Advisory
times, usually twice a week, pending additional conflicts, such as assemblies,
etc. Decisions about page format, background and link options, along with
learning the navigation aspects of Netscape Composer took many sessions
due to the collaborative effort of all levels of students working on the
project. At one point, we needed to review the effectiveness of working
in a collaborative manner and setting up roles and responsibilities to
accommodate all learner needs. Lessons other than the previously stated
goals needed to be incorporated along the way to promote effective group
decision-making.
After group instruction on evaluation of web sites, students began
to discuss and direct options they felt significant for the project.
Students chose to work with a partner in the beginning phase of the project.
Student interest was a major part of this phase. Students researched specific
genres, such as mystery to find appropriate links. They used a web evaluation
form to scrutinize the value of the page as a link specific to the middle
level population.
Development of the actual web pages is continually being updated. Students
are meeting with peers, as members of the National Junior Honor Society
as a Service Learning opportunity, are collaborating with students to assist
in editing and revision of entries being submitted. Our initial submissions
that were in Power Point format cannot be uploaded until Power Point is
approved to be installed, as Power Point/html as an option was never installed
on the computers in our lab.
Students learned the process and created student-friendly instructions
for using the digital camera (to take pictures to add to the site about
reading) and a scanner to add illustrations or student-designed book jackets
to individually submitted book reviews.
Technology and Tools utilized throughout the sessions: Netscape,
Netscape Composer, Microsoft Word, Digital Camera, Hewlett Packard ScanJet,
Power Point, and graphics applications. Students were also instructed in
designing a form template and creating links to pages.
Evaluation:
As reviews were being developed for presentation on the web, it was
apparent that further instruction was necessary in editing and revision
writing. It was at this time that I sought out our National Junior Society
as a peer coaching option and a Service Learning opportunity to work with
the students in draft writing and editing. This was also a time to reflect
with teachers in teacher planning sessions concerning the continued need
for differentiation and skill attainment in regards to writing and editing
skills. Purposeful staff development opportunities were suggested and refined
to address the issues. I also learned from the students that varied levels
of skill attainment need refinement and reflection in my own practice and
application of teaching and instruction. My thoughts at first, centered
on opportunities for instruction and development of the technology aspects
of this project, only to discover that the language arts connection to
grammar and editing took more time than planned and I needed to revisit
my goals to adjust timelines for completion. In addition, the schedule
this past trimester had numerous deviations from "schedule" due to SAT
testing preparation, additional clubs, and assemblies scheduled for this
pre-planned time which overrode meeting opportunities. My initial planning
schedule of meeting twice a week during Homeroom/Advisory time was out
of my control. Additional make-up opportunities were not successful. Many
aspects of the project took longer than anticipated, although valid for
meeting criteria of the project.
Student excitement about this project is growing as students bring
back comments from their peers about the progress of the web site and the
number of students asking to be part of the project development. When teachers
were asked about the project, they relate that students are asking if their
work can be submitted to this "newly created team" for presentation on
the web. This truly reflects taking work to a larger audience and what
authentic assessment reflects.
Students are waiting to see our site. The projection for the site to
be added to our school home page is February 2001 to be unveiled by students
showing their work, at Parent/Teacher Conferences. The community link will
be present, as our site will be highlighted in our monthly mailed newsletter
that every family receives at home.
Strengths of Project:
-
Students are interested in being part of this on-going project;
-
It is an on-going project - revisions are mandated by students involved
with the purposeful integration of the project into their reading
repertoire;
-
Enlists students (and parents) to visit our school web site;
-
Makes our school web site more appealing to students;
-
Takes our student work to a new, larger audience
Drawbacks of Project:
-
Scheduling students during Homeroom or Advisory time, which is usually
a flexible time due to need for assemblies, special projects, club meetings,
etc.
-
Homeroom/Advisory time is short - only 30 minutes
-
Space for meeting with students in our current building is limited; Computer
labs are open during Homeroom time for individual students/projects, sometimes
restricting my use;
-
Not necessarily a drawback - but a need for me to revise my criteria -
This project has begun to take on a life of its own. Students and teachers
continually see opportunities for growth and use of this site; (for example
- students seeing that the school Accelerated Reading list be linked; teachers
asking for rubrics to be added to the project lists; an option for Author
study groups has been discussed, etc.)
-
Training students to use Power Point was not as difficult as I presumed,
as most students are fairly fluent, although as students were ready to
add their power point reviews, I found that I couldn't save power point
presentations as a html as that option was never loaded on our school computers.
I now need to get approval for that option to be added to be able to upload
the power point reviews.
Conclusion:
Although I chose a project that will develop and transform over time,
I currently see many indicators of success. My initial objectives were
met. I purposely kept the pilot stage small to measure success and afford
reliability. Time to meet with students and student accessibility was less
than anticipated with other building initiatives competing for the predetermined
Homeroom time. Student engagement is predominant in all aspects of the
project. Although I have a cadre of students working on the school
web page, I decided to take on a new charge of students to fulfill the
goals of this project. I chose to include students who had little or no
experience with web design or navigation of the Internet, specifically
to assess the complexity and future success of the project at its final
stage. An overriding concern was that the opportunity for this project
to be successful was based on the accessibility and comfort level of all
students, not just those who are already "comfortable" with the use of
technology to integrate information.
Continuation of this project in the Second Trimester will reinforce
the comprehension of this project. This project is on going, with the final
results not being apparent until the summer reading project is underway.
Hopefully, with student, parent and teacher support and engagement, reading
literacy at the middle school level will improve, with student choice and
opportunity being the hallmark of the project.