Theory Reading 6

Dianne Fulton

Edpsy –490i

 

 

The Levin et al. article summarizes many teachers' ideas about what the World Wide Web is. What is your own metaphor about the web? More generally, what is the value of metaphors for generating understandings?

 

            The Levin el al. article suggests that the various metaphors ascribed to the World Wide Web are as numerous as the personalities that use the Web.  The summary conclusion, “The most striking (finding) in the diversity of mental modes that people have, both for the Internet and for its uses.  The second is that experts differ from novices not in the kinds of models they have, but in having multiple, detailed models that they switch between in the process of using the network to accomplish tasks.”  Those with more Internet experience are aware of its potential and comprehend the very vastness of the World Wide Web.  Those just beginning to use the Internet (novices) develop an ever increasing awareness of its possibilities on a daily, but may remain “tangled” in the vast “strings” of the web until the newness wears off.  As Levin’s indicates, it is easy to identify those who do not appreciate the web (i.e. those who call it fungus) and those that do not comprehend it (i.e. consider it an encyclopedia).  The metaphors evolve as one becomes more familiar with web resources.  The metaphors indicate the attitude of the personality and at what level of instruction (about technology) is appropriate.

            Experience demonstrates that it takes more than one class about technology for classroom teachers to become familiar with use of its various tools.  Not only do teachers require a general understanding of technology, they must know how to apply it to the student’s needs, experience, and skill levels.  Availability, time constraints, and computer capability are some of the practical considerations for the application of computer training in the classroom.  Educators no longer have the latitude to avoid such considerations; however, some school districts are failing to keep abreast of the rapid advances in technology.  This evidence arises in District 186 by the absence of any IBM-based computers in the elementary schools.  Maybe this indicates what metaphor might be that the technology directors have for technology at that level.

 

It's been said that a metaphor is the only way to take a learner from what is known, to what is new. Arguably, every computer application and interface makes some use of existing understandings in the form of metaphors. Consider for instance the graphical interface metaphors built around 'office' concepts - such as desktops, internet-delivered 'mail,' 'paint pallettes' in graphic design programs. What are some of the more successful (or less successful!) examples of metaphoric borrowing you have seen on the web? What do/don't you like about them?

 

Metaphors are useful as comparisons.  Learning occurs when there are associations with experiences or prior knowledge.  Some examples of metaphor use on the Web, is with Netscape-one “navigates” with their system.  This is an adequate term for a beginner since many feel that they navigate through a new sea of discovery.  Shockwave employed for an Interactive Game for the major project provided some interesting metaphors.  This program uses a musical score to compose the program.  The contents of each page are the “cast,” and so on.  Obviously, this is someone’s idea of a good analogy and visual representation.  Since metaphors are useful as memory triggers and attitude indicators, their use for the vastness of technology is helpful with the higher levels of cognizance and focus needed to perform many of the tasks.  One needs to analyze, understand, categorize, and employ the information obtained. 

Brent Wilson  (Metaphors for instruction: Why we talk about learning environments) states that, “The ‘information superhighway’ metaphor, now widely used to convey the implications of high-performance computing and communications, is an inadequate analogy.”  Many of the metaphors are contained in the names of many of the software products solely for marketing proposes.  As a result, many are very misleading.  Consider, as examples, “Word Perfect, Opera, Yeah Write, Outlook, Power Point, etc.”  Which one came close to what it was indicating in its name?  One cannot help but wonder what Microsoft now has up their sleeve with their new XP products.  Is it really an eXPerience, a crossing point, or a gross marketing error?

 

Considering the progress made to date, my current metaphor is that the World Wide Web is more than a superhighway, it is an ever expanding universe of bodies of knowledge, high-speed transfer, inner communications, communication to other galaxies of humans and technologies, and open to infinite possibilities.  We are the early explorers and pioneers on an adventure if not on the Internet, at least, in getting our schools “wired” and “on-line.”