Crime and Punishment
of Graffiti
Vandalism
The distinguished artist, Claes Oldenberg, expressing
his fascination with graffiti wrote that "… standing there in the
station, everything is gray and gloomy and all of a sudden one of those
graffiti trains slides in and brightens the place like a big bouquet from
Latin America." (reference?) Similarly, the art critic, Lisa N. Horworth,
claimed that "graffiti has the 'high art' characteristics of a 'strong
and identifiable aesthetics theory' and a similarity to such recognized
art movements as abstract expressionism, pop art, conceptual art, and new
realism." (Horworth, 1989, p. 556) Despite of this appreciation,
graffiti is still a very expensive crime to fight in many cities, both
in the past and in the present:
|
|
Back to Home Page
| According to Gomez, many states
and cities, in their battle against graffiti, have “encouraged more arrests
and prosecution” (1993, p. 658) by: Most sates have criminal mischief or malicious mischief statues, include California, New York, Indiana, Kentucky, Washington, Alaska. A number of states have specific criminal laws against the destruction of, or damage to, property, include Colorado, California, Wyoming, Texas, and Kentucky, Illinois. |
|
Back to Home
Page
Back to top
Back to Home Page