Week 1:  Reflections

on readings

 on guest speaker

CPRE Policy Briefs
    As I read this brief, I was pleased to see that my district was using bits and pieces of the suggestions... but only bits and pieces.  There were also areas in which my district will never use.
    In recent years, I have served on two subject committees to chose new text books for the district.  As a member of the math committee, we looked at the NCTM standards when reviewing text books.  For the past two years I was a member of the science committee.  We were each responsible for checking our grade level texts to the Illinois State Standards.  Both the math and science series seemed to be aligned well.  Actually the science committee lasted two years because the text book companies were in the process of developing new editions.  The year we did not purchase new texts, we used the money for classroom teachers to choose about $400 in trade books.  We were able to move away from using our reading texts all of the time!
    As for increasing the diversity of student population, this past year was the first time my school had a separate LD classroom.  The students were in and out of the regular classroom all day.  For one class, I even had a second teacher or aid in the room of inclusion purposes.
    Of course one major change in student assessment has been the changes in ISAT.  After several years of suggestions, the administration finally agreed to let us teach Illinois in fourth grade rather than in fifth to better align ourselves with what was being tested.  The district is also "experimenting" - I guess you can call it that - with portfolios.  We have had writing portfolios for a long time, but I have yet to find anyone that reviews, and who knows what happens when they leave the district after eight grade.  This past year my school started to collect general work for another portfolio.  I can see several problems occurring.  First, we didn't seem consistent in what was being chosen for the portfolios or in how the work was chosen.  Also, again, who is going to take the time to look at previous work and where are we going to store all of this new paper!
    The article did concern me when it talked about so many different ways to make reforms.  They all sound great, but what about resources?  Money and time are both important issues.  There are always teachers that won't do something unless "they have to" or are paid to do it.  Teachers also don't have a lot of time.  Back to the portfolios.  The school also does not have a big money base.  Teachers don't take the time to write grants... or are afraid to try.  Having a partnership with a college would be great.  Lincoln has two small colleges, one Christian and one junior college.  Neither has the ability to form a lasting relationship with our school.  We occasionally get tutors/mentors but there aren't enough to go around.
    The section "Professional development should take explicit account of the contexts of teaching and the experience of teacher" really hit home hard.  This spring it was plain stupid to have the music and PE teachers sit through the inservice about the new science texts.  The district should have found something productive for the "teachers that didn't fit the one size" to do.  When districts force teachers into useless inservice, they are going to be even less motivated to better themselves as teachers.
    It took a little while, but I am actually enjoying helping with the School Improvement Plan.  I thing many of the teachers are enjoying it.   Once we figured out what we were to do, we were able to brainstorm and work together to improve the learning going on in our rooms.  It is very pleasing to see teachers be self motivated to make improvements.
back to the top

A New Vision for Staff Development Renewing America's Schools
    I read the quote "What everyone appears to want for students a wide array of learning opportunities that engage students in experiencing, creating, and solving real problems, using their own experiences, and working with others is for some reason denied to teachers when they are learners" and could relate.  I have really enjoyed taking workshops and classes where I was an active learner.  Sometimes it was a little uncomfortable getting started, but as the class progressed, it was wonderful to see how things should be working in my classroom.  It gave me a better picture to strive for.  I have also enjoyed taking classes in which I could try out the information and ideas immediately in my own classroom.
    As I read the sections on the Three Powerful Ideas for reshaping schools, I saw some of that happening in my own district.  First, Results-Driven Education seems to fit well with our School Improvement Plan.  We are striving for "clarity of focus, beginning with the end in mind, [have] high expectations for all students, and [work toward] expanded opportunities for success in student learning."  As a staff, we are trying to make changes to better the education for all.  Next, the section on System Thinking was harder for me to see in my district.  I understand how the process it to work, but I'm not sure that I have been around long enough for me to see/realize that  happening in the school.  I guess the best example would be the IGAPs forcing primary teachers to teach writing at an earlier age and now the upgrade students receive better writing scores.  The Constructivism idea hit home the hardest.  After having taken two of Chip Bruce's Inquiry classes, I really appreciate this type of learning.  Of course the "constructivist framework-whole-language, manipulative mathematics programs, hands-on science, and cooperative learning techniques" means a need for more money.   My room was totally empty - except for texts - when I was hired, what I purchased with my own money was what I could use to teach without texts.  Things are better now, but more teachers need to be giving the opportunity to take Inquire classes and to get a hold of the manipulatives and trade books needed to teach in this fashion.
    The article also mentioned that training teachers needs to be followed by coaching.  I firmly believe this.  Just as we don't expect students to learn something in one shot, teachers need support and encouragement when they are learning a new way to teach.  Teachers would be much more inclined to make self-improvements if they knew they weren't alone.
 

back to the top

Learn and Live, short articles in Ch. 1 & 8
Chapter 1:
  As I read the first article, I said to myself... "Wow! Sign me up to work at King School.  It's perfect!"  Then as I read on I found that it wasn't a perfect school, it's not even real.  Yes, it would be wonderful to teach at a school where all students are self motivated to learn, but a lot of things would have to change.  Change is hard for most people.  Not only teachers would have to change their way of teaching, but administration at all levels would have to change.  Since students would be working on learning in what they are most interested, administrations and governments would have to realize that all students would not be accountable for all the information that they are now.  Standardized tests would definitely not be given at King School.  Parents and the community would also have to realize that things were different than when they were in school.  The article did not discuss all of the aches and pains that were experienced as they made the transition to the "perfect school."  I wonder how long it took and what opposition was met?
    Ms. Carrero's experience in Florida really hit home.  When I was a junior, I wrote an essay about a car accident.  When I received the graded paper, there were no grammatical or spelling problems, only the grade "A-".  At the bottom of the paper, the teacher had written "this isn't what really happened."  What did the teacher know about what happened?  She wasn't there!  I was driving!  I totalled the car!  Just as Ms. Carrero wasn't able to state her own opinions, I wasn't able to discuss my true feelings about the event without being called a liar.  It is terrible to think about how long that each of us has one little comment that has effected us for so long.  I am glad that she was able to return to her previous school where she could think for herself.  I was stuck with he same teacher for two years!
    It was nice to read the second article to see that a school similar to King does exist.  I do wonder though,  was the educational experience as good for everyone as it was for Ms. Carrero?  Did they all know that they had something to appreciate?

back to the top

Chapter 8:
    When I read about the Millennium School, I was frustrated.  It was another perfect but fictional school.  But as I continued to read both articles, I became very pleased that my school seemed to be already doing some of the idea.  Two years ago, my school started a School Community Council.  It is made up of a few parents and teachers.  (As far as I know there are no business participants at this time.)  The council has sponsored school wide programs such as a class attendance contest and an upper grade homework completion contest.  The students became very excited about the contests as the the year progressed.  (It was interesting to note that 5th and 6th grade students did a better job completing homework and they younger kids were better at coming to school on time. - Both 4th grades had trouble with both contests.)  Northwest also seems to have an apathy problem among parents.  The community council is trying to motivate parents to take part in school activities.  Next year the parents are going to be invited to attend a special night each month.  One month will consist of art activities, while others may be technology, music or physical education.  I am very excited to see if they will work.  As of now, students are not part of the governing system of the school, but maybe in the future they will be suggesting ideas on how to improve the school and learning process.

back to the top

Reflection on guest speaker Tom McGreal
    Wow!  This ideas seemed so realistic and doable.  Maybe because Professor McGreal has spent so much time in school settings.  His comment, "It's not necessarily the fact that people don't want to change, it's just that we all are going to be more comfortable sort of doing the things we are most familiar with, or falling back on the idea of 'well, this is how I was trained to teach, and it has worked for me all these years',  so it is harder to get veterans to change," is exactly what I had been thinking about during this week's reading but was not able to put into words.  We can all get set into our ways and not want to make a change.  As we make changes in our education system, teaching methods, curriculum, etc., we need to find ways to help the teachers want to make changes.
    As a read the section on working in teams, I thought back to all of my experiences working in groups and thought that CTER is the first positive group experience that I have had.  Then as I read more I realized that there are many other "team" experience that I have found successful while teaching:  inclusion science class, team teaching with the other 4th grade teacher, and the CTER "network" web board.  A year ago I was part of a reading initiative committee, where I attended several workshops throughout the year with area teachers.  We were paid to attend and I could tell the few people that were there just for the money, but many teachers took advantage of the time together.  We shared ideas and networked. I wish the project could have continued.... even for free!   It was awesome.
    I also thought his suggestion for teachers to tie the new State Certification requirements into the district and buildings was ideal.  What a great way to improve on our School Improvement Plans!  Teachers would really feel that they have accomplished something, rather than taking a class just to fulfil the requirement.
    Professor McGreal did make a comment with which I did not entirely agree.  He said that new teachers are not prepared to work with parents.  As a student in the Year Long Project, I felt very capable of talking to parents.  I was exposed to pre year conferences and fall conferences at Kenwood, spring conferences at Thomas Paine and a personalized communication note to parents each Friday.  My school district now does not require so much parent contact.  I thought it was weird.  Although we don't have the pre conferences or spring conferences, I have always felt comfortable communicating with parents through Friday notes and conferences.
 

back to the top

Back to the assignment page.