For stage 3 I have looked at all of my assessment techniques listed here and tried to decide if I needed to change anything.  I wish I would have taken the advise of one of my colleges who suggested that I lie or under emphasis in stage one, so that it would really show improvements by stage 3.  Over the years I have evaluated my assessments and this chart represents the best for me so far.  However, I decided to get a more concrete feel for what the class was absorbing during the walk around by doing some random sampling of written responses to some of my oral prompts.  I haven’t tried this yet so I will let you know how it goes.  The biggest change is in the lab reports.  Lab reports really link up with Illinois state goal 11 and 12.  However I was not doing a good job of communicating the goals and the expectations to the students.  Therefore I have designed a chec bric (rubric) to better challenge the student, but in a way that communicated the expectations to them.  To see this rubric click on the link in the Lab reports row.

 

 

Assessment Technique

Function

Category

Stage 3 alternate assessment

Questioning

After given some basic facts students should be

able to apply deductive thinking skills to go

one-step further.  There are no wrong answers; the

object is to get students to infer something that

makes sense from what is given.

Placement

No change

Walk around

Always used when students are working in groups

at their desks and more often at the lab stations.

This allows the students to ask me questions or me

to give guidance.  Usually I will make a few

comments or suggestions and check back later to

see where they take it.

Formative

Randomly ask 3 students to write out the focus of the day’s lesson.

Content related activities

Allow the students to practice on their own and

reinforce class material.  These are often math

activities that verify the science.

Diagnostic

No change

Quizzes

I give frequent quizzes in which I orally ask the

questions and the students write the answers.

These are only 10% of their grade and the main

purpose is to get the students to keep up with the

material.

Formative

No change

Written Lab Reports

Reinforces scientific method and allows the student

to express what they are learning in their own

words.  This assessment more than any other tells

me which students are mastering science thinking

skills. 

Summative

I modified this assessment dramatically. Click here for details.

Written tests

Mostly multiply choice tests but written at an

application level.  Being able to transfer the

knowledge gained in class to a novel situation is

stressed.  Whenever math is applicable it is applied.

Summative

No Change

Lab practical tests

Performance assessment as students move from

station to station.  Given about 4 times a year and

include things like measuring, correct lab usage and

technique, making percent solutions. and identifying

form and function for dissection tests.

Summative

No change at this time